That’s one of the reasons I like the HP multi-function devices –Ī printer and scanner combined gets you both parts of the equation. Print anything in order to sign it and FAX it back, you’ll want some kind of You plan on simply keeping all your FAXes on your PC only, or you never plan to It kind of goes without saying, but you probably also want a printer. Then scanning that signed document in order to FAX it back. Workarounds, it typically means signing a physical piece of paper and There’s one “gotcha” to going scannerless: signatures. It may be quite enough to be able to save your documentįrom your word processor for use by the FAX software we’ll talk about in a Planning on FAXing documents that you’re creating on your computer, you may not Now, if you don’t need to actually scan existing documents, say you’re The document page – or perhaps you’d use a utility to assemble them into a “.png”, or “.tif” graphics images – they are, after all, just a “picture” of
Using your scanner you can capture images of the I’m partial to the HP multi-function devices that are If you mean to FAXĮxisting paper documents, much like a real FAX machine, you’re probably going Hardware – depending, of course, on your needs and what hardware you alreadyįirst, we need to “input” whatever it is you want to FAX. That there are several approaches, many of which don’t require any additional Seems like “old technology” to me, but I’m apparently not about to change my Industries that are still using FAXes as a primary means of doing business. I find myself dealing with this on a semi-regular basis.
0 kommentar(er)
